Программа (мероприятие): Федеральная целевая программа «Научные и научно-педагогические кадры инновационной России»

Заключение

• 
  Простая проблемно-ориентированная настройка системы;
  
• 
  Быстрая установка процедур анализа данных, основанная на концепции открытой архитектуры;
  
• 
  Создание сложных сессий обработки с помощью Job Control Language (JCL) – проблемно-ориентированного языка;
  
• 
  Обмен данными с использованием концепции Data Stack, позволяющей различным подсистемам и процессам обработки SNDP обмениваться многоканальными данными;
  
• 
  Использование интегрированной графической подсистемы, для многоканального интерактивного анализа.
  

Список использованных источников

1. 
   Hamburger, R.O., and C.A. Kircher, Editors (2000), “Seismic Design Provisions and Guidelines,” Earthquake Spectra 16(1), P. 307
   
2. 
   Somerville, P., and Y. Moriwaki (2003), Seismic Hazards and Risk Assessments in Engineering Practice, International handbook of earthquake and engineering seismology, 2, 1065-1080
   
3. 
   Wells, D.L., and K.J. Coppersmith (1994). Analysis of empirical relations among magnitude, rupture length, rupture area and surface displacement. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 84, P. 974-1002
   
4. 
   Somerville, P.G., K. Irikura, R. Graves, S. Sawada, D. Wald, N. Abrahamson, Y. Iwasaki, T. Kagawa, N. Smith, and A. Kowada (1999). Characterizing earthquake slip models for the prediction of strong ground motion. Seism. Res. Lett. 70, P. 59-80
   
5. 
   Schwartz, D.P., and K.J. Coppersmith (1984), Fault behavior and characteristic earthquakes from the Wasatch and San Andreas faults, J. Geophys. Res. 89, P. 5681-5698
   
6. 
   Wald, D.J., and T.H. Heaton (1994). Spatial and temporal distribution of slip of the 1992 Landers, California earthquake. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 84, P. 668-691
   
7. 
   Ward, S.N. (1994). A multidisciplinary approach to seismic hazard in Southern California. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 84, P. 1293-1309
   
8. 
   Snoke, J.A., J.W. Munsey, A.G. Teague and G.A. Bollinger (1984). A program for focal mechanism determination by combined use of polarity and SV-P amplitude ratio data. Earth quake notes 55, P. 15
   
9. 
   Ebel, J.E. and K.J. Bonjer (1990). Moment tensor inversion of small earthquakes in southwestern Germany for fault plane solutions. Geophys. J. Int. 101, P. 133-146
   
10. 
    McGuire,R.K. (1976). EQRISK. Evaluation of earthquake risk to site. United States Department of the Interior, Geological Survey, Open File Report 76-67, P. 90
    
11. 
    Ordaz,M. (1991). CRISIS. Brief description of program CRISIS. Institute of Solid Earth Physics, University of Bergen, Norway, Internal Report, P. 16
    
12. 
    Kradolfer, U. (1996). AutoDRM-The First Five Years. Seismological Research Letters, P. 67
    
13. 
    Jost, M. L., R. Herrmann (1989). A student's guide to and review of moment tensors. Seism. Res. Lett., 60, P. 37-57
    
14. 
    Dreger, D., and A. Kaverina (2000). Seismic remote sensing for the earthquake source process and near-source strong shaking: A case study of the October 16, 1999 Hector Mine earthquake. Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, P. 1941-1944
    
15. 
    Fukuyama, E., and D. Dreger (2000). Performance test of an automated moment tensor determination system for the future «Tokai» earthquake. Earth Planets Space, 52, P. 383-392
    
16. 
    Pasyanos, M. E., D. S. Dreger, and B. Romanowicz (1996), Towards Real-Time Determination of Regional Moment Tensors. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 86, P. 1255-1269