Правительство Российской Федерации Государственное образовательное бюджетное учреждение высшего профессионального образования

Тема 5: Проблема «служебных разоблачений».

1. 
   Banisar, David. (2009). Whistleblowing: International Standards and Developments. Transparency International –
   

2. 
   Brown, A. J. (Ed.) (2008) Whistleblowing in the Australian Public Sector. Canberra, ANU E Press. http://epress.anu.edu.au/whistleblowing_citation.html;
   
3. 
   De Maria, W. (2006). Common Law-Common Mistakes. Protecting Whistleblowers in Australia, New Zealand, South Africa & the United Kingdom. International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 19, No. 7, pp. 643-658;
   
4. 
   Osterhaus, Anja and Fagan, Craig. (2009). Alternative to Silence: Whistleblower Protection in 10 European Countries. Transparency International –
   

5. 
   Sulzner, George T. (2009). Creating a Strong Disclosure-of-Wrongdoing Regime: The Role of the Public Service Integrity Officer of Canada. Public Integrity, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 171–188.
   

1. 
   A Comparative International Analysis of Regimes for the Disclosure of Wrongdoing (“Whistleblowing”). Canada: Public Service Integrity Office, 2004.
   
2. 
   Calland R. (Ed.) (2005) Whistleblowing around the World: Law, Culture and Practice. Idasa;
   
3. 
   McDonald Dryburgh, Martinella (2009). Personal and Policy Implications of Whistle-Blowing: The Case of Corcoran State Prison. Public Integrity, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 155–170;
   
4. 
   Park Heungsik, Rehg M. T., Donggi Lee. (2005) The Influence of Confucian Ethics and Collectivism on Whistleblowing Intentions: A Study of South Korean Public Employees. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 58, No. 4, p. 387–403;
   
5. 
   Truelson, Judit A. (2000) Whistleblower Protection and the Judiciary, in: Cooper T. L. (Ed). Handbook of Administrative Ethics (Public Administration and Public Policy). New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 407-428.
   
6. 
   U.S. MSPB (1992) Whistleblowing in the Federal Government: An Update. Report by U.S. Merit System Protection Board.
   
7. 
   Ventriss C., Barney, Shane M. (2003) The Making of a Whistleblower and the Importance of Ethical Autonomy: James F. Alderson. Public Integrity, Vol. 5, No. 4, p. 355-368.
   

Тема 6: Координирующие органы в сфере административной этики.

1. 
   Конов А. В. Этика публичной политики: британский и российский опыт в мировом контексте // Этика публичной политики: Из опыта работы Комитета по стандартам публичной сферы Великобритании – М.: Институт права и публичной политики, 2005. – с. 8-53;
   
2. 
   Gay O. (2005) Comparing Systems of Ethics Regulation. International Public Management Journal, Vol. 8, No.2, p. 175-186;
   
3. 
   Meagher, Patrick (2005) Anti-corruption agencies: Rhetoric versus Reality. The Journal of Policy Reform, Vol. 8, No. 1, p. 69-103;
   
4. 
   OECD (1996) Ethics in the public service: Current issues and practice. Paris: OECD.
   

1. 
   Behnke, N. (2002) A Nolan Committee for the German Ethics Infrastructure?
   European Journal of Political Research, Vo. 41, No. 5, p. 675–708;
   
2. 
   Brown A.J., Head B. (2005) Institutional Capacity and Choice in Australia’s Integrity Systems. Australian Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 64, No. 2, p.84-95;
   
3. 
   Gibson, Pamela A. (2009). Examining the Moral Reasoning of the Ethics Adviser and Counselor: The Case of the Federal Designated Agency Ethics Official. Public Integrity, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 105–120;
   
4. 
   Heilbrunn, John R. (2004) Anti-Corruption Commissions: Panacea or Real Medicine to Fight Corruption? Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development /The World Bank;
   
5. 
   Rosenson, Beth A. (2003) Against their Apparent Self-Interest: The Authorization of State Legislative Ethics Commissions, 1973-96. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, No. 3, p.42-65;
   
6. 
   Smith R. W. (2003) Enforcement or Ethical Capacity: Considering the Role of State Ethics Commissions at the Millennium. Public Administration Review, Vol. 63, Issue 3, p. 283-295.