http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domino_theory.
Duverger M. Duverger’s Law: Forty Years Later. In: Grofman B., Lijphart A. (eds.). Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences. – New York. – Pp. 69-84.
Eisenhower D. (1954). Domino Theory Principle // Public Papers of the President Dwight D. Eisenhower, pp. 381- 390.
Fireman B., Gamson W. (1977). Utilitarian Logic in the Resource Mobilization Perspective // CRSO Working Paper. http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/50928/1/153.pdf.
Frank Z. (2001). Elite Families and Oligarchic Politics on the Brazilian Frontier. – Latin American Research Review, Vol. 36, № 1, pp. 49-74.
Frantz E., Ezrow N. (2011). The Politics of Dictatorship. Institutions and Outcomes in Authoritarian Regimes. - Boulder and London. - Pp. 1-13.
Gandhi J., Przeworski A. (2007). Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival of Autocrats. – Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 40, № 11, pp. 1279-1301.
Gehlbach S., Keefer P. (2012). Private Investment and the Institutionalization of Collective Action in Autocracies: Ruling Parties and Legislatures // The Journal of Politics, Vol. 74, № 2, pp. 621-635.
Gleditsch K., Ward M. (2006). Diffusion and the International Context of Democratization // International Organization, Vol. 60, № 4, pp. 911-933.
Heckathorn D. (1996). The Dynamics and Dilemmas of Collective Action // American Sociological Review, № 61, pp. 250-277.
Hellman J. (1998). Winners Take All. The Politics of Partial Reform in Postcommunist Transitions // World Politics, Vol. 50, № 2, pp. 203-234.
Johnson J., Joslyn R. (1991) Political Science Research Methods. Washington, D.C. - Pp. 1-32.
Jones Luong P. , Weinthal E. Oil Is Not a Curse: Ownership Structure and Institutions in Soviet Successor States. – New York.
Karl T. (2010). Oil-Led Development: Social, Political, and Economic Consequences // CDDRL Working Paper № 80.
Kelly C., Kelly J. (1994). Who Gets Involved in Collective Action? Social Psychological Determinants of Individual Participation in Trade Unions // Human Relations, Vol. 47, № 1, pp. 363-88.
Knoke D. (1988). Incentives in Collective Action Organizations // American Sociological Review, № 53, pp. 311-329.
Kuran T. (1989). Sparks and Prairie Fires: A Theory of Unanticipated Political Revolution // Public Choice, № 61, 41-74.
Leeson P., Dean A. (2009). The Democratic Domino Theory: An Empirical Investigation // American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 53, № 3, pp. 533-551.
Lipset S., Rokkan S. (1967). Cleavage Structures, Party Systems and Voter Alignments (фрагмент). http://janda.org/c24/Readings/Lipset&Rokkan/Lipset&Rokkan.htm.
Malesky E., Schuler P. (2011). The Single-Party Dictator's Dilemma: Information in Elections Without Opposition // Legislative Studies Quarterly, Vol. 36, № 4, pp. 491-530.
Marwell G., Oliver P., Prahl R. (1988). Social Networks and Collective Action: A Theory of the Critical Mass. III // American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 94, № 3, pp. 502-534.
May J. (1965). Democracy, Organization, Michels // The American Political Science Review, Vol. 59, № 2, pp. 417-429.
Mayhew B., Levinger R. (1976). On the Emergence of Oligarchy in Human Interaction // American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 81, № 5, pp. 1017-1049.
Melville A. (2011). Oligarchy. In: Badie B., Berg-Schlosser D., Morlino L, (eds.). International Encyclopedia of Political Science. - Thousand Oaks. - Pp. 1739-1741.
Moise E. The Domino Theory. http://www.americanforeignrelations.com/A-D/The-Domino-Theory.html.
Moser R., Scheiner E. (2004). Mixed Electoral Systems and Electoral System Effects: Controlled Comparison and Cross-National Analysis // Electoral Studies, № 23, pp. 575-599.
Neto O., Cox G. (1997). Electoral Institutions, Cleavage Structures and the Number of Parties // American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 41, № 1, pp. 149-174.
North D., Weingast B. (1989). Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutional Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England // The Journal of Economic History, Vol. 49, № 4, pp. 803-832.
Oliver P. (1993). Formal Models of Collective Action // Annual Review of Sociology, № 19, pp. 271-300.
Oliver P., Marwell G. (1988). The Paradox of Group Size in Collective Action: A Theory of the Critical Mass. II // American Sociological Review, № 53, pp. 1-8.
Olson M. (1963). Rapid Growth as a Destabilizing Force // The Journal of Economic History, Vol. 23, № 4, pp. 529-552.
Poteete A., Ostrom E. (2004). Heterogeneity, Group Size and Collective Action: The Role of Institutions in Forest Management // Development and Change, Vol. 35, № 3, pp. 435-461.
Putnam R., Leonardi R., Nanetti R. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. – Princeton.
Rickert H. (1899). Natur- und Kulturwissenschaften. Любое издание.
Riker W. (1982). The Two-Party System and Duverger's Law: An Essay on the History of Political Science // The American Political Science Review, Vol. 76, № 4, pp. 753-766.
Riker W. (2003). Duverger’s Law Revisited. In: Grofman B., Lijphart A. (eds). Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences. – New York. – Pp. 19-68.
Ross M. Oil and Democracy: Preliminary Draft. http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/polisci/faculty/ross/Oil%20and%20Democracy%20Revisited.pdf.
Smith A. (2008). The Perils of Unearned Income // The Journal of Politics, Vol. 70, № 3, pp. 780-793.
Starr H. (2005). Territory, Proximity, and Spatiality: The Geography of International Conflict // International Studies Review, № 7, 387–406.
Treisman D. (2011). Presidential Popularity in a Hybrid Regime: Russia under Yeltsin and Putin // American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 55, № 3, pp. 590-609.
Wintrobe R. (1990). The Tinpot and the Totalitarian: An Economic Theory of Dictatorship // The American Political Science Review, Vol. 84, № 3, pp. 849-872.
Wintrobe R. (2000). The Political Economy of Dictatorship. – Cambridge.
|
